issue_comments: 542916210

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3238#issuecomment-542916210 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3238 542916210 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0MjkxNjIxMA== 14808389 2019-10-16T22:23:59Z 2019-10-16T22:30:19Z MEMBER

I have been using a PR to hgrecco/pint#764 because that has been the version that had the most tests pass. Is that okay, or should I use the original PR instead?

So something like this?

Added integration tests against pint <https://pint.readthedocs.io/>_. Note that these tests currently require a special version of pint <https://github.com/andrewgsavage/pint/pull/6> (install with pip install git+https://github.com/andrewgsavage/pint.git@refs/pull/6/head) to run and are otherwise skipped. Also note that at the moment of writing, there are issues when pint interacts with non-numpy array libraries, e.g. dask or sparse.

Edit: this one works

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   484015016