issue_comments: 536078107
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3349#issuecomment-536078107 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3349 | 536078107 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUzNjA3ODEwNw== | 35968931 | 2019-09-27T20:02:02Z | 2019-09-27T20:02:02Z | MEMBER | I am in favour of adding this (and other common functionality), but I would comment that perhaps we should move forward with discussion about where to put extra functionality generally (the scipy to xarray's numpy if you will)? If only because otherwise the API could get to an unwieldy size? I can't remember where the relevant issue was, but for example this might go under an |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
499477363 |