issue_comments: 523898016
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1097#issuecomment-523898016 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1097 | 523898016 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyMzg5ODAxNg== | 5635139 | 2019-08-22T13:07:44Z | 2019-08-22T13:07:44Z | MEMBER |
This is correct - functions which convert between There's a bigger piece of work which would solve this too, at the cost of abstraction: have class attributes which define
Right, good question and we should catch ourselves from adding every abstraction. I have one specific use-case we've already found helpful: we have an object that is mostly a Dataset, with the addition of some behaviors and constructors - for example We don't use accessors because the behaviors are specific to a class, rather than every xarray object. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
188113943 |