issue_comments: 522350359
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3176#issuecomment-522350359 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3176 | 522350359 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyMjM1MDM1OQ== | 5635139 | 2019-08-18T19:56:19Z | 2019-08-18T19:56:19Z | MEMBER | Good work on finding that issue. I think even if we can get something brief in, that would be helpful. On the specific definitions:
For me 'dimension' has a precise definition from traditional sciences, so having our 'coordinate' be an additional / auxiliary / alternative dimension wouldn't be consistent with that (e.g. a 4-dimensional array would still be 4 dimensional regardless of how many coordinates it had).
👍 |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
476103888 |