issue_comments: 522299956
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3226#issuecomment-522299956 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3226 | 522299956 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyMjI5OTk1Ng== | 2818208 | 2019-08-18T07:53:07Z | 2019-08-18T07:53:07Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I did not want to overreach with this PR, but I agree that the documentation is verbose. It seems to follow a logical order of information without making reasonable assumptions about the contributor. I think the docs would be better suited following an inverted pyramid of information. In that light, something like this PR checklist or an overview would be at the top with quick links to more detailed information at the bottom. For example, while it's true that you need to know about git before contributing, how many people need to learn git or forking or creating branches when first contributing? My guess is that this is the minority, and the docs could reflect this by putting such reference material near the bottom of the page. Also added a note to "What's new". |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
481935553 |