issue_comments: 514002753
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1524#issuecomment-514002753 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1524 | 514002753 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxNDAwMjc1Mw== | 1217238 | 2019-07-23T00:18:05Z | 2019-07-23T00:18:05Z | MEMBER |
Yes, to some degree. I'm still troubled by that the "default" algorithm (which is selected by default) has no error bounds. It seems a little backwards to me to default to a fast algorithm with unknown accuracy. Also, it still only works on 1D arrays, which would not be terribly useful for us. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
252548859 |