issue_comments: 508407631
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3054#issuecomment-508407631 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3054 | 508407631 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwODQwNzYzMQ== | 2552981 | 2019-07-04T09:15:14Z | 2019-07-04T09:15:14Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @yohai It's a lot more efficient to simply iterate over the underlying array, ie. If you are instead using streaming computation based on dask, then you would have to do something similar on per-chunk basis. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
462049420 |