issue_comments: 50437246
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/191#issuecomment-50437246 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/191 | 50437246 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwNDM3MjQ2 | 1217238 | 2014-07-29T05:56:26Z | 2014-07-29T05:57:36Z | MEMBER | Actually, I'm thinking now that we could probably (theoretically) fit all interpolation strategies into a single That said... perhaps its better to stick with a simpler function for now and we can figure out the bigger picture later. Looking at all the scipy functions, there are a lot of hypothetical options and I'm not sure which we'd want to keep in the final method. Also, kitchen sink type functions (e.g., |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
38849807 |