issue_comments: 50437246
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/191#issuecomment-50437246 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/191 | 50437246 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwNDM3MjQ2 | 1217238 | 2014-07-29T05:56:26Z | 2014-07-29T05:57:36Z | MEMBER | Actually, I'm thinking now that we could probably (theoretically) fit all interpolation strategies into a single That said... perhaps its better to stick with a simpler function for now and we can figure out the bigger picture later. Looking at all the scipy functions, there are a lot of hypothetical options and I'm not sure which we'd want to keep in the final method. Also, kitchen sink type functions (e.g., |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
38849807 |