issue_comments: 497473031
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2281#issuecomment-497473031 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2281 | 497473031 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5NzQ3MzAzMQ== | 1217238 | 2019-05-30T20:24:56Z | 2019-05-30T20:24:56Z | MEMBER |
2665872 is roughly 1600^2.
I think this is true sometimes but not always. The details depend on the geographic projection, but generally a good mesh has some notion of locality -- nearby locations in real space (i.e., on the globe) should also nearby in projected space. Anyways, as I've said above, I think it would be totally appropriate to build routines resembling scipy's griddata into |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
340486433 |