issue_comments: 493839144
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2956#issuecomment-493839144 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2956 | 493839144 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5MzgzOTE0NA== | 1217238 | 2019-05-20T04:59:16Z | 2019-05-20T04:59:16Z | MEMBER | This looks like a good start to me. So we can start making progress on this, I think it would make sense to hide this behavior behind an option, e.g., I would consider writing some tests with two of the ndarray subclasses that ship with NumPy:
- Both of these subclasses violate some important principles of subclassing, namely they aren't substitutable with objects of their parent class. Thus, I think it would be reasonable to explicitly "blacklist" them for use inside in xarray.DataArray. I think we already explicitly convert MaskedArray objects, but perhaps we should also add a check for In terms of operations, one big class that comes to mind are aggregations, e.g., |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
443157666 |