issue_comments: 487476404
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2919#issuecomment-487476404 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2919 | 487476404 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4NzQ3NjQwNA== | 10050469 | 2019-04-29T07:28:36Z | 2019-04-29T07:28:36Z | MEMBER | Thanks! Yes, I've tested on a conda env and it works. So my take is that it probably won't work out-of-the box on debian/ubuntu/mint where rasterio is installed via pip. So my question to @shoyer or @jhamman : should we change this example for the nicer code above, even if a minority of people (pip users like me) might find that this doesn't work for them? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
437126178 |