issue_comments: 483370027
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1850#issuecomment-483370027 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1850 | 483370027 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MzM3MDAyNw== | 1386642 | 2019-04-15T18:41:22Z | 2019-04-15T18:41:22Z | CONTRIBUTOR | To be clear, I think there is some optimal middle ground between the "mega xarray-contrib" package and the current situation. I think the "micro-package" approach works when the collection of micro-packages is being maintained by an active/permanent entity (e.g. Ryan research group). On the other hand, postdocs and grad students are very likely to leave the field entirely within a few years, at which point they will probably stop maintaining their "micro-packages". |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
290593053 |