issue_comments: 483342686
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1850#issuecomment-483342686 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1850 | 483342686 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MzM0MjY4Ng== | 1386642 | 2019-04-15T17:22:37Z | 2019-04-15T17:22:37Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I'd also like to thank @teoliphant for weighing in! Bearing in mind the history of scipy, I agree that the xarray community doesn't need 100% centralization, but there should be some conglomeration. IMO, the current situation of "one graduate student/postdoc per package" is not sustainable. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
290593053 |