home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments: 469898607

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2799#issuecomment-469898607 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2799 469898607 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2OTg5ODYwNw== 5635139 2019-03-05T23:16:43Z 2019-03-05T23:16:43Z MEMBER

Cython + memoryviews isn't quite the right comparison here.

Right, tbc, I'm only referring to the top two lines of the pasted benchmark; i.e. once we enter python (even if only to access a numpy array) we're already losing a lot of the speed relative to the loop staying in C / Cython. So even if xarray were a python front-end to a C++ library, it still wouldn't be competitive if performance were paramount. ...unless pypy sped that up; I'd be v interested to see.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  416962458
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.649ms · About: xarray-datasette