issue_comments: 469445483
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2799#issuecomment-469445483 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2799 | 469445483 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2OTQ0NTQ4Mw== | 5635139 | 2019-03-04T22:20:58Z | 2019-03-04T22:20:58Z | MEMBER | Thanks for the benchmarks @nbren12, and for the clear explanation @shoyer While we could do some performance work on that loop, I think we're likely to see a material change by enabling the external library to access directly from the array, without a looped python call. That's consistent with the ideas @jhamman had a few days ago. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
416962458 |