home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments: 469086121

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2616#issuecomment-469086121 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2616 469086121 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2OTA4NjEyMQ== 1217238 2019-03-04T01:04:39Z 2019-03-04T01:04:39Z MEMBER

Do we want to stick with the names manual_combine and auto_combine?

Some other possibilities:

  • Instead of manual_combine: concat_nd, concat_nested, multi_concat
  • Instead of auto_combine:assemble, reassemble, combine_sorted, concat_sorted, unify

I guess auto/manual works well with the values of the keyword argument, and makes it clear that these are a different class of operation than the primitive concat and merge. Though if we really want to emphasize the similarity (especially to help auto-complete), we might consider even switching the order of the words, e.g., combine_auto and combine_manual.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  391865060
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.957ms · About: xarray-datasette