home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • GraphQL API
  • Search all tables

issue_comments: 463829789

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2766#issuecomment-463829789 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2766 463829789 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2MzgyOTc4OQ== 1217238 2019-02-14T22:34:04Z 2019-02-14T22:34:04Z MEMBER

It's not entirely clear to me where we should draw the line between included wrappers in xarray and leaving this to external packages, e.g., see xr-scipy.readthedocs.io

If we do include this in xarray, I would prefer to have both (1) a clear policy around what we include (e.g., only direct wrappers for numpy/scipy functions) and (2) a separate namespace for wrapped functions, e.g., xarray.linalg or something more generic like xarray.wrapped.

Note that with NEP-18 we'll be able to directly everything in numpy.linalg on xarray objects, without requiring the use of a separate wrapper.

cc @pydata/xarray for discussion

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  409618015
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.736ms · About: xarray-datasette