issue_comments: 460428737

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2723#issuecomment-460428737 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2723 460428737 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2MDQyODczNw== 8699967 2019-02-04T21:55:16Z 2019-02-04T21:55:16Z CONTRIBUTOR

I definitely agree 💯 with you on avoiding redundancy. I actually had the same thought. However, part of the reason for using crs_wkt is motivated by CF 1.7 convention. I figured it was a small change that sacrifices redundancy for consistency across the community. The crs_proj4 name was just an attempt to be consistent with your original comment and the crs_wkt. But, I think renaming it to proj4 to remove redundancy is a good choice as well.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   404088563