issue_comments: 455790039
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2593#issuecomment-455790039 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2593 | 455790039 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1NTc5MDAzOQ== | 6628425 | 2019-01-19T15:33:43Z | 2019-01-19T15:38:08Z | MEMBER |
That's great news!
Before spending too much time on that just yet, see if you can resolve the merge conflicts, and if you can think about a way to reduce the length of the existing tests. It would be helpful to see a coverage report generated by coveralls for the new logic you've added (if you resolve the merge conflicts our CI here will run and we'll be able to see that automatically). Maybe start by commenting out a bunch of the really long tests and see where things stand? Then we can think about how to add coverage back in as needed. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
387924616 |