issue_comments: 452014148
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2652#issuecomment-452014148 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2652 | 452014148 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1MjAxNDE0OA== | 1217238 | 2019-01-07T17:29:45Z | 2019-01-07T17:29:45Z | MEMBER | I agree that the case for DataArray.dot is questionable. It sort of makes sense because numpy and pandas both have it as a method, but the @ operator is a really a cleaner way to express this now that we're Python 3 only. (Speaking of which, why don't we support @ in xarray yet? :).) On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 1:43 AM Keisuke Fujii notifications@github.com wrote:
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
396102183 |