home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments: 444715777

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2553#issuecomment-444715777 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2553 444715777 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0NDcxNTc3Nw== 35968931 2018-12-06T01:34:18Z 2018-12-06T10:03:26Z MEMBER

I think that would mean there might be some situations that 1D auto_combine() could deal with but nested_concat_and_merge() could not. Situations where you can only merge the variables once they have been individually concatenated. (actually I'm not sure - I would need to think about that)

I think this is a question of whether you think that:

a) auto_combine() is a well-defined operation that is still well-defined in N-D

or

b) auto_combine()'s purpose is to do it's best to combine whatever is thrown at it, and more surgical N-D operations should be the job of another function

I personally think a), but I expect users who haven't read the source code for auto_combine() might disagree.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  379415229
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.757ms · About: xarray-datasette