issue_comments: 442906486
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1603#issuecomment-442906486 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1603 | 442906486 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0MjkwNjQ4Ng== | 5635139 | 2018-11-29T16:46:52Z | 2018-11-29T16:46:52Z | MEMBER | And broadening out further:
This is basically how I think of indexes - as a performant lookup data structure, rather than a feature of the schema. An RDBMS in a good corollary there. Now, maybe there's enough overlap between the data access and the data schema that we should let them couple - e.g. would you want to be able to run We probably don't need to answer this question to proceed, but I'd be interested whether others see indexes as a property of the schema / I'm missing something. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
262642978 |