issue_comments: 435544853
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2159#issuecomment-435544853 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2159 | 435544853 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzNTU0NDg1Mw== | 1217238 | 2018-11-03T00:22:46Z | 2018-11-03T00:22:46Z | MEMBER | @TomNicholas I agree with your steps 1/2/3 for My concern with a single Currently we always do (2) and never do (1). We definitely want an option to disable (2) for speed, and also want an option to support (1) (what you propose here). But these are distinct use cases -- we probably want to support all permutations of 1/2.
I'm not sure we need to support this yet -- it would be enough to have keyword argument for falling back to the existing behavior that only supports 1D concatenation in the order provided.
Agreed, not important unless someone really wants/needs it. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
324350248 |