issue_comments: 42872192
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/66#issuecomment-42872192 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/66 | 42872192 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyODcyMTky | 1217238 | 2014-05-12T18:51:21Z | 2014-05-12T18:51:21Z | MEMBER | In principle, I think dimension scales are all we need to interpret HDF5 files as xray Datasets. That's also most of what you need to make a netCDF4 file, but I would not be surprised if NetCDF libraries have issues with HDF5 files that don't conform to every last NetCDF convention. For reference, here is the full NetCDF4 spec (pretty short!): https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/docs/netcdf/NetCDF_002d4-Format.html We don't yet support reading from groups or subgroups (other than the root group To support HDF5 properly, including interesting use cases like yours, I think it we should probably write our own interface to h5py, instead of reading everything through the NetCDF libraries. Ideally, we could set this up to write HDF5 as (mostly) valid NetCDF4, at least in the simpler cases where that makes sense. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
29453809 |