issue_comments: 426646669
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2459#issuecomment-426646669 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2459 | 426646669 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyNjY0NjY2OQ== | 5635139 | 2018-10-03T13:55:40Z | 2018-10-03T16:13:41Z | MEMBER | My working hypothesis is that pandas has a set of fast routines in C, such that it can stack without reindexing to the full index. The routines only work in 1-2 dimensions. So without some hackery (i.e. converting multi-dimensional arrays to pandas' size and back), the current implementation is reasonable*. Next step would be to write our own routines that can operate on multiple dimensions (numbagg!). Is that consistent with others' views, particularly those who know this area well? '* one small fix that would improve performance of |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
365973662 |