issue_comments: 424499776
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2330#issuecomment-424499776 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2330 | 424499776 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyNDQ5OTc3Ng== | 5635139 | 2018-09-25T21:00:12Z | 2018-09-25T21:00:12Z | MEMBER | Yes, I agree - given the reluctance on the principle around "calling a constructor on an object of the same type needs to work" - it's right not to make this change. Thanks for holding that principle. I'll close this; let me know if there's any change around this I make in its place. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
346294369 |