issue_comments: 422949121
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2398#issuecomment-422949121 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2398 | 422949121 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyMjk0OTEyMQ== | 1217238 | 2018-09-19T20:35:43Z | 2018-09-19T20:35:43Z | MEMBER | @rabernat my inclination would be to draw the line at regular grids (with or without periodic boundary conditions), which are pretty commonly encountered in data analysis for any continuous physical systems. We would leave non-regular cases like staggered-grids to add-ons like xgcm -- these grids tend to be more application/PDE specific. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
356698348 |