issue_comments: 420474101
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2398#issuecomment-420474101 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2398 | 420474101 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyMDQ3NDEwMQ== | 6815844 | 2018-09-12T00:49:23Z | 2018-09-12T00:49:23Z | MEMBER | Thanks, @dopplershift .
Yes, correct. But if we have closer data points, then the estimate of the gradient becomes more precise. Sorting the array according to the coordinate provides the closest points, resulting in the most precise estimate of the gradient. But I also think users can do it manually before taking the gradient. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
356698348 |