issue_comments: 419218306
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2389#issuecomment-419218306 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2389 | 419218306 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQxOTIxODMwNg== | 1217238 | 2018-09-06T19:46:03Z | 2018-09-06T19:46:03Z | MEMBER | Removing the self-references to the dask graphs in #2261 seems to resolve the performance issue on its own. I would be interested if https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2391 still improves performance in any real world yes cases -- perhaps it helps when working with a real cluster or on large datasets? I can't see any difference in my local benchmarks using dask-distributed. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
355264812 |