issue_comments: 416389795
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2159#issuecomment-416389795 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2159 | 416389795 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQxNjM4OTc5NQ== | 1217238 | 2018-08-27T22:29:22Z | 2018-08-27T22:29:22Z | MEMBER | @TomNicholas I think your analysis is correct here. I suspect that in most cases we could figure out how to tile datasets by looking at 1D coordinates along each dimension (e.g., indexes for each dataset), e.g., to find a "chunk id" along each concatenated dimension. These could be used to build something like a NumPy object array of xarray.Dataset/DataArray objects, which could split up into a bunch of 1D calls to I would rather avoid using the
We could potentially just encourage using the existing |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
324350248 |