issue_comments: 413774281
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2370#issuecomment-413774281 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2370 | 413774281 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQxMzc3NDI4MQ== | 6815844 | 2018-08-17T06:48:54Z | 2018-08-17T06:48:54Z | MEMBER |
I didn't notice that. I also think that bottleneck should be an optional dependency. @shoyer, can you check this? Maybe this file defines dependency?
I think this is a reasonable option. Personally, I think we can consider to stop using bottleneck entirely or make it completely optional.
With dask backend, bottleneck is not being used and we use this konly in nan-aggregation methods for numpy backend and the rolling operation.
After #1837, our |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
351000813 |