issue_comments: 407404131
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2288#issuecomment-407404131 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2288 | 407404131 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwNzQwNDEzMQ== | 8699967 | 2018-07-24T13:21:31Z | 2018-07-24T13:32:42Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Here is an example of how it would look on a dataset:
@djhoese Whether or not we use the CF convention is not what I am concerned about. What I think would benefit the most people is with the file format to be able to do Another benefit is that it keeps the Also, as a side note if you use the center pixel coordinates, then GDAL, rasterio, and QGIS are able to read in the file and determine it's affine/transform without a problem. For the new library, if you have a For example, using the recommended method to extend xarray, you could add a crs property:
And if you call your extension |
{
"total_count": 4,
"+1": 4,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
341331807 |