issue_comments: 406104928
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2298#issuecomment-406104928 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2298 | 406104928 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwNjEwNDkyOA== | 1217238 | 2018-07-18T23:26:57Z | 2018-07-18T23:26:57Z | MEMBER | The main practical difference is that it allows us to reliably guarantee that expressions like The typical example is spatially referenced imagery, e.g., a 2D satellite photo of the surface of the Earth with 2D latitude/longitude coordinates associated with each point. It would be very expensive to store full latitude and longitude arrays, but fortunately they can usually be computed cheaply from row and column indices. Ideally, this logic would live outside xarray. But it's important enough to some xarray users (especially geoscience + astronomy) and we have enough related functionality (e.g., for lazy and explicit indexing) that it probably makes sense to add it. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
342180429 |