home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments: 405750184

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2289#issuecomment-405750184 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2289 405750184 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwNTc1MDE4NA== 1217238 2018-07-17T22:34:48Z 2018-07-17T22:34:48Z MEMBER

Thing is, I don't know if performance on dask.dataframe is fixable without drastically changing its design.

I suppose we could at least ask?

Also while I think dask.array is an amazing building block of xarray, dask.dataframe does feel quite redundant to me...

I agree somewhat, but I hope you also understand my reluctance to grow CSV export and distributed computing logic directly in xarray :). Distributed CSV writing is very clearly in scope for dask.dataframe.

If we can push this core logic into dask somewhere, I would welcome a thin to_csv() method in xarray that simply calls underlying dask method.

{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  341355638
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.621ms · About: xarray-datasette