issue_comments: 400800345
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2249#issuecomment-400800345 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2249 | 400800345 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwMDgwMDM0NQ== | 7217358 | 2018-06-27T19:25:10Z | 2018-06-27T19:38:46Z | NONE | I was trying to apply the same groupby('lat','long').apply() strategy for interpolating time series of optical remote sensing images. With @shoyer 's suggestions I managed to apply and paralellize a ufunc, which was significantly faster than operating by pixels. However I am still looking for a way to optimize the spline fitting and evaluation (maybe numba, as suggested). Any other suggestions would be appreciated. Im working with dask arrays, and my data looks like this:
``` def _cubic_spline(y, orig_times, new_times): # Filter NaNs nans = np.isnan(y)#.values)[:,0] # Try to fit cubic spline with filtered y values try: spl = interpolate.CubicSpline(orig_times.astype('d')[~nans], y[~nans])
``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
335523891 |