issue_comments: 400043753
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2217#issuecomment-400043753 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2217 | 400043753 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwMDA0Mzc1Mw== | 291576 | 2018-06-25T18:07:49Z | 2018-06-25T18:07:49Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Do we want to dive straight to that? Or, would it make more sense to first submit some PRs piping the support for a tolerance kwarg through more of the API? Or perhaps we should propose that a "tolerance" attribute should be an optional attribute that methods like In addition, we are likely going to have to implement a decent chunk of code ourselves for compatibility's sake, I think. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
329575874 |