issue_comments: 400043753
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2217#issuecomment-400043753 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2217 | 400043753 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwMDA0Mzc1Mw== | 291576 | 2018-06-25T18:07:49Z | 2018-06-25T18:07:49Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Do we want to dive straight to that? Or, would it make more sense to first submit some PRs piping the support for a tolerance kwarg through more of the API? Or perhaps we should propose that a "tolerance" attribute should be an optional attribute that methods like In addition, we are likely going to have to implement a decent chunk of code ourselves for compatibility's sake, I think. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
329575874 |