issue_comments: 39388919
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/88#issuecomment-39388919 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/88 | 39388919 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5Mzg4OTE5 | 1217238 | 2014-04-02T21:54:14Z | 2014-04-02T21:54:14Z | MEMBER | The bigger problem with redundant coordinates would be other machinery (e.g., for broadcasting arrays) which assumes that coordinates are unique. For this function, the second use of the coordinate just wouldn't appear in the representation. My guess is that most functions should degrade relatively gracefully (like this one), because I usually use If we want to support arrays with duplicate dimensions, we should definitely add some test cases. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
30656827 |