issue_comments: 393284049

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2199#issuecomment-393284049 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2199 393284049 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5MzI4NDA0OQ== 1550771 2018-05-30T19:16:32Z 2018-05-30T19:16:32Z NONE

Thanks for the feedback! I'll try to drive the pandas conversation along, but since I doubt that will be resolved in the near term so I think until then we should definitely pursue the accessor approach (which is much better than the property monkey patching we're doing now).

Personally I'd prefer DataArray.hvplot() since I think even the two extra characters make a difference and something like DataArray.hv.plot.contourf() seems too deeply nested. That said if "our preference for accessor names to match projects" is a solidly established convention I'll defer to that and go with DataArray.holoplot().

@rabernat Since you have used HoloViews with xarray in the past I'd very appreciate your input as well.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   327725925