issue_comments: 385830499
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2097#issuecomment-385830499 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2097 | 385830499 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4NTgzMDQ5OQ== | 6815844 | 2018-05-02T00:33:17Z | 2018-05-02T00:33:17Z | MEMBER | Thanks for the report. We did not consider to store an object type array other than string, but it should be supported. I think we should improve this line, https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/39b2a37207fc8e6c5199ba9386831ba7eb06d82b/xarray/core/variable.py#L171-L172 We internally use many inhouse array-like classes and this line is used to avoid multiple nesting. I think we can change this line to more explicit type checking. Currently, the following does not work either
For your perticular purpose, the following will be working
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
319329850 |