issue_comments: 384291663
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2079#issuecomment-384291663 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2079 | 384291663 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4NDI5MTY2Mw== | 1197350 | 2018-04-25T13:44:39Z | 2018-04-25T13:44:39Z | MEMBER | Regarding interpolation, this is one of the most common needs of users. I would support adding some sort of basic interpolation directly within xarray. I would eventually like to see multilinear n-dimensional interpolation supported.
xrft is focused quite narrowly on spectral analysis. It is very useful for our research group. But we haven't put much effort into making it widely accessible or comprehensive. I agree that in principle it would be good to merge efforts. However, we say this often about this type of project, but in practice I'm not sure we have the time to really accomplish it. It would take significant developer effort. xr-scipy seems the most mature and well designed of the three packages, so that should probably be the one we focus efforts on if we go that route. |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
317421267 |