issue_comments: 366533315
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1905#issuecomment-366533315 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1905 | 366533315 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NjUzMzMxNQ== | 1191149 | 2018-02-18T17:46:48Z | 2018-02-18T17:46:48Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
My variable objects present a pure numpy array, so they follow numpy indexing precisely with one exception. If the files are actually netCDF4, they have the same limitations of the netCDF4.Variable object.
I have not tested separate processes. In many cases, I use numpy memmap. So that will be the limitation.
Same as numpy, but also has support for the netCDF4 style.
I use relative dates following netcdf time conventions. Within my software, there are special functions for translation, but I have seen this be treated by xarray separately.
I added TravisCI, but haven't looked Appveyor.
I added a ci/requirements-py36-netcdf4-dev.yml as a part of my TravisCI integration. I am also working on a recipe (like https://github.com/conda-forge/xarray-feedstock). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
296561316 |