issue_comments: 363921064
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1895#issuecomment-363921064 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1895 | 363921064 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2MzkyMTA2NA== | 1217238 | 2018-02-07T21:44:33Z | 2018-02-07T21:44:33Z | MEMBER |
Yes, that should be the case here. Each of these array objects is very lightweight and should be quickly pickled/unpickled. On the other hand, once evaluated these do correspond to a large chunk of data (entire arrays). If this future needs to be evaluated before being passed around that would be a problem. Getitem fusing is pretty essential here for performance. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
295270362 |