issue_comments: 362104114
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1875#issuecomment-362104114 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1875 | 362104114 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2MjEwNDExNA== | 6815844 | 2018-01-31T23:19:27Z | 2018-01-31T23:19:27Z | MEMBER | I like the option 1. I agree that the circular coordinate is used in many physics fields (actually I'm not from geoscience and I also sometimes use the circular coordinate), but one confusing sene I can think of is when using it in radian, (0, 0.5 pi, pi ...). Manual overwite would be more explicit Another option could be to add a circular cooredinate class after #1603 is implemented? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
293345254 |