home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments: 359131278

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1840#issuecomment-359131278 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1840 359131278 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM1OTEzMTI3OA== 1217238 2018-01-20T01:06:07Z 2018-01-20T01:06:07Z MEMBER

As mentioned in https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1842, maybe we should also make a point not to upcast float32 input?

One possible concern with changing precision from float64 -> float32 is that some reduce operations like mean could become due to lower precision. So it's a good think @fujiisoup wrote https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1841 so we can specify dtype in reductions :).

With regards to Hypothesis: I haven't used it, but it does seem very intriguing. I'm sure that it could turn up quite a few bugs in xarray. Would it make sense to add it as an optional dependency to the test suite? Even if we use Hypothesis to cover more edge cases, I think we will still want normal test coverage for most behavior.

{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  289853579
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.827ms · About: xarray-datasette