issue_comments: 357996887
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1832#issuecomment-357996887 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1832 | 357996887 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM1Nzk5Njg4Nw== | 306380 | 2018-01-16T15:27:33Z | 2018-01-16T15:27:33Z | MEMBER | ```python monthly climatologyds_mm = ds.groupby('time.month').mean(dim='time') anomalyds_anom = ds.groupby('time.month')- ds_mm ``` I would actually hope that this would be a little bit nicer than the case in the dask issue, especially if you are chunked by some dimension other than time. In the case that @shoyer points to we're creating a global aggregation value and then applying that to all input data. In @rabernat's case we have at least twelve aggregation points and possibly more if there are other chunked dimensions like ensemble (or lat/lon if you choose to chunk those). |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
288785270 |