issue_comments: 352397809
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1712#issuecomment-352397809 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1712 | 352397809 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM1MjM5NzgwOQ== | 4414299 | 2017-12-18T11:17:33Z | 2017-12-18T11:17:33Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @fmaussion Seems okay to me. The rasterio version check is a bit iffy but I can't think of a way to do it better. I do agree with @snowman2 though, having the coordinate generation separately exposed would be nice (and easier to write unit tests for). Something like ```python def xy_pixel_coordinates(nx, ny, transform=None) transform = Affine.identity if not transform else transform
``` would probably suffice, though I don't know which module this would fall under. I'd imagine it might be useful for backends besides rasterio, though. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
273268690 |