issue_comments: 349771464
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1761#issuecomment-349771464 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1761 | 349771464 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTc3MTQ2NA== | 1882397 | 2017-12-06T20:54:18Z | 2017-12-06T20:54:18Z | NONE | @jhamman Ah, I didn't see that. In hindsight the install docs seem like an obvious place to look for info about this... @maxim-lian That pandas solution would have saved me a bit of debugging :-) I guess another option would be to only replace functions that are present in Bottleneck. As long as they only add and never change functions this would allow xarray to use even very recent additions to bottleneck. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
279456192 |