issue_comments: 348635463
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1749#issuecomment-348635463 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1749 | 348635463 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0ODYzNTQ2Mw== | 2443309 | 2017-12-01T22:52:13Z | 2017-12-01T22:52:13Z | MEMBER | A practical downside to masking both values is that we won't be able to round-trip the two part fill/missing value. Once everything is a NaN, that's all we get. That said, I'm personally fine with masking both. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
278122300 |