issue_comments: 345919689
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1704#issuecomment-345919689 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1704 | 345919689 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0NTkxOTY4OQ== | 2443309 | 2017-11-21T05:17:14Z | 2017-11-21T05:17:14Z | MEMBER | @jbusecke -
In your case, what would that have looked like? Many users have actually requested that xarray provide a more streamlined reader function that does less checking. Perhaps it would have been useful for you to have xarray raise an error when it encountered files that weren't consistent (either in the variable, dimensions, or coordinates)? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
272415954 |