home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments: 345374271

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1725#issuecomment-345374271 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1725 345374271 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0NTM3NDI3MQ== 1197350 2017-11-17T21:46:14Z 2017-11-17T21:46:14Z MEMBER

I just had to confront and understand how lazy CF decoding worked in order to move forward with #1528. In my initial implementation, I applied chunking to variables directly in ZarrStore. However, I learned that decode_cf_variable did not preserve variable chunks. So I switched the chunking to after the call to decode_cf.

My impression after this exercise is that having two different definitions of "lazy" within xarray leads to developer confusion! So I favor putting dask more central in xarray's data model.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  274797981
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.708ms · About: xarray-datasette